Skip to content
OverviewGetting startedCreating challengesChallenge analyticsEvaluating submissions
Partners

Evaluating submissions

Score student work with rubric criteria and comments.

Evaluate student work via the Judging Portal at /partner/judging or the legacy Evaluate tab at /partner/challenges/{id}/submissions.

Judging Portal (recommended)

The Judging Portal is a judge-first surface with two modes:

Online judging

Route: /partner/judging/[challengeId]/online

For async review of submissions. Each judge sees their assigned queue with embedded artifacts — write-ups inline, YouTube links as video players, and Google Docs / Drive / PDF links as document previews (plus “open in new tab”). Questionnaire answers and team details stay available beside the sticky rubric panel.

  • Desktop-first; mobile-responsive
  • Score status: Save only · Save & shortlist · Mark winner (leads) · Reject

In-person / live judging

Route: /partner/judging/[challengeId]/live

For demo days and pitch events. Score-sheet-first — artifacts are hidden by default. Look up a team by short code or name, then enter rubric scores using large stepper controls.

  • Tablet and phone optimised
  • Find teams by 6-character code or name search
  • Session mode: event leads can activate a live session which triggers the minimal live chrome for all judges

Legacy Evaluate tab

The original Evaluate tab (/partner/challenges/{id}/submissions) remains active for power users and admins. It renders all partner-visible submissions with the full rubric panel and is the current export surface. A Judging Portal link in the challenge sub-nav takes you directly to the mode landing.

Steps (online judging)

  1. Open Judging in the org portal navigation.
  2. Select a challenge → Online review.
  3. Pick a submission from the queue.
  4. Review artifacts and score each rubric criterion.
  5. Save scores (optionally shortlist or reject).

Steps (live / in-person judging)

  1. Open Judging → challenge → Live scoring.
  2. Enter the team's short code or search by name.
  3. Score each rubric criterion using the stepper controls.
  4. Save and move to the next team.

Rubric scoring

Use consistent scoring so students understand expectations. Comments should be actionable — what was strong, what to improve.

Note

Partner evaluation is separate from admin gallery approval. Both may be required before work appears publicly.

PreviousChallenge analytics